Knowledge and Information Systems An International Journal ISSN: 0219-1377 (printed version) ISSN: 0219-3116 (electronic version) by Springer

REVIEW FORM

• Reviewers are encouraged to read the "Guidelines for Reviewers" on the Web (http://kais.bigke.org/).
• Please refer to the KAIS Reviewer Awards (at "http://kais.bigke.org/reviewerawards.shtml") for information about each reviewer's mandatory rating by the handling editor and the KAIS reviewer certificates and award books.
• An ASCII text copy of this form is available by anonymous ftp from "http://kais.bigke.org/reviewfm.txt".

Paper Number:
Paper Title:
Author(s):

Name of Editorial Board Member:
Name of Reviewer (if different from EB member):

Date Sent:
Date to be Returned:

RATINGS OF PAPER
[Please rate the following by entering a score between -3 to 3 with 0 being the average based on the following guidelines:

3:	Strong Accept (As good as any top paper in reputable journals)
2:	Accept (Comparable to good papers in reputable journals)
1:	Weak Accept (I vote acceptance, but won't argue for it)
0:	Neutral (I don't like it, but I won't object if others like it)
-1:	Weak Reject (I would rather not see this paper accepted)
-2:	Reject (I would argue to reject this paper)
-3:	Strong Reject (Definitely detrimental to the journal quality if accepted)]

        Originality of the paper:              
        Technical soundness:     
        Significance:            
        Clarity of presentation:   
        Relevance to KAIS:
         - Is the paper topic on the KAIS topic list?  ( ) yes ( ) no

      About right: 
      Should be shortened:    
      Should be extended: 

  If the paper should be shortened, please indicate an expected number
  of pages (in its submission format) to be removed:

      Reject:
      Accept with no changes:
      Accept subject to minor revisions:
      Author should prepare a major revision for a second review:   
       (Not applicable if the paper in question is itself a major
        revision of a previously reviewed paper.)

  If a major revision, will you be willing to re-review a revised version of this paper?
  Yes ( ) No ( )
  (An "no" answer is equivalent to a reject recommendation.)

  If the paper is accepted, it should be published as a

   	regular paper:
   	short paper: